Third Circuit Rules It Is Illegal to Discriminate Against an Employee For Having an Abortion
Subscribe to our RSS Feed:
Topics
- 'Full Marriage Equality' Editorial
- Governor Christie Makes History By Politicizing the New Jersey Supreme Court
- School Bullying Results in 800000 Verdict
- Big Brother is Watching Civil Rights Abuses by Schools
- Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
- Why Arbitration Agreements Are Un-American
- It's Time to Pierce the Corporate Veil in Discrimination Cases
- Sexual Discrimination in Contractual Relationships
- The Truth About Who Files Lawsuits
- Of Free Speech vs. Hate Speech
- Plausibility and Common Sense DANGER
- I Didn't Sexually Harass Her But They Fired Me Anyway
- Why Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Claims Is Un-American
- New Jersey Considers Workplace Bullying Law
- Racial Harassment in Bergen County-Justice for Roberth Morales
- Third Circuit Rules It Is Illegal to Discriminate Against an Employee For Having an Abortion
- Courts Unfriendly to Employment Plaintiffs-Harvard Study
- Finally-Religious Based Harassment is Truly Illegal in New Jersey
- Corporate Greed
- Bigoted Pediatrician
- Governor Corzine Lets Down The People of New Jersey
- Racism in the Jury Box
- The McDonalds Myth
- Caps On Damages Dont Work
- A Rose By Any Other Name - Marriage
- What Workplace Harassment Says About Our Society
- The Road So Far
Recent Updates
July 7, 2010
'Full Marriage Equality' Editorial
July 1, 2010
Governor Christie Makes History By Politicizing the New Jersey Supreme Court
June 1, 2010
School Bullying Results in 800000 Verdict
May 1, 2010
Big Brother is Watching Civil Rights Abuses by Schools
April 1, 2010
Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
Third Circuit Rules It Is Illegal to Discriminate Against an Employee For Having an Abortion
Posted by: Kevin Costello
In a recent and controversial ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, it was decided that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act - and by extension, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination - prohibits an employer for discriminating against an employee for having an abortion. This was a case of first impression.
Because Title VII and the LAD bar discrimination on the basis of sex, these same laws also pertain to pregnancy. Pregnancy, in turn, has been defined as including child birth or related medical conditions. As long as a woman is "affected" by pregnancy, that counts as "pregnancy," and thus as gender or sex.
The plaintiff in this case had contended that she had undergone a surgical abortion and that she was discriminated against and terminated as a result. The defense to that particular claim had been that there was no protection under the law for an individual who had decided to have an abortion.
While the 3rd Circuit has been normally somewhat conservative as of late, and while employees generally don't enjoy a high rate of success there, the 3rd Circuit obviously did the right thing here. As long as a woman's right to chose is still alive, and as long as it is a constitutionally protected right, an employer cannot discriminate simply because a woman exercises that right or experiences complications or medical issues as a result.
The plaintiffs' employment bar is encouraged by this correct and reasonable decision.
JOURNEY TO JUSTICE
DISCLAIMER: This web log is not legal advice, nor should it be construed to be legal advice or the offering of legal advice. It should not be read as guaranteeing or suggesting any particular outcome in any Court will occur in any particular case. It is not, and should be read as, a complete or authoritative analysis of the state of law, which is constantly subject to change.
"Journey to Justice" - The Web Log of Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Kevin M. Costello, Esq. (www.costellomains.com).
