Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
Subscribe to our RSS Feed:
- New Jersey Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Discusses Teen Sexting & The Suicide of Hope Witsell
- New Jersey Employment, School Harassment, School Discrimination and Civil Rights Attorney Discusses Cyber Bullying and the Law
- Workers' Compensation Rights are Protected by Law
- New Jersey Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Discusses Public Perception and Misinformation
- Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Talks About the Truth Behind Tort Reform
- Employment and Civil Rights Attorney discusses the Citizens United Decision and Corporate Status
- Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Discusses United States Supreme Court Case Involving Proposition 8
- Religious Public Accommodations are 'Public' Accommodations
- Never Discuss Politics or Religion in Polite Company
- EEOC Shuts the Door On Employer Witness Tampering
- Once You've Paid Your Debt to Society You Deserve the Chance to Work
- Healthcare is a Civil Right
- New Jersey Employment Attorney Discusses 'Cat's Paw' Liability for Discrimination and Retaliation Claims
- New Jersey Employment and Civil Rights Lawyer Discusses Marriage Equality in New Jersey
- Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses 2011 National Business Ethics Survey 'Workplace Retaliation on the Rise'
- Consumer and Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Discusses Bill Prohibiting Attorney's Fees for 'Technical Violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act'
- Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Applauds Appointment of First Openly Gay Supreme Court Justice in New Jersey Bruce Harris
- Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Arkansas' Supreme Court Declaration of Punitive Damages 'Cap' as Unconstitutional
- New Jersey Civil and Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Penn State and Syracuse Sex Abuse Cases
- New Jersey Civil Rights Attorney Opposes Christie's Remarks About Judge Feinberg
- New Jersey Harassment Lawyer Discusses Gay Bashing Statements by Public School Teacher
- The Occupation of New York City - What it Means to You
- The End of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'
- Justice is About More Than Money
- Proud to be an American
- The Steady Slide Toward Theocracy in the United States
- The 'Nullification' Amendment and the Destruction of America
- Honorable Republican Against Tort Reform
- Don't Change the Consumer Fraud Act
- New Jersey’s Anti-Bullying Law Not Tough Enough
- California Elects its First Transgendered Judge
- What I'm Thankful For
- The Beginning of The End For 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
- No Compelled Defense Medical Exams in New Jersey Discrimination Cases
- Unfair Doesn't Mean Illegal
- Everyone vs. Everyone Why South Park’s Treatment of Sexual Harassment in Schools is no Joke
- The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is Unconstitutional
- 'Full Marriage Equality' Editorial
- Governor Christie Makes History By Politicizing the New Jersey Supreme Court
- School Bullying Results in 800000 Verdict
- Big Brother is Watching Civil Rights Abuses by Schools
- Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
- Why Arbitration Agreements Are Un-American
- It's Time to Pierce the Corporate Veil in Discrimination Cases
- Sexual Discrimination in Contractual Relationships
- The Truth About Who Files Lawsuits
- Of Free Speech vs. Hate Speech
- Plausibility and Common Sense DANGER
- I Didn't Sexually Harass Her But They Fired Me Anyway
- Why Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Claims Is Un-American
- New Jersey Considers Workplace Bullying Law
- Racial Harassment in Bergen County-Justice for Roberth Morales
- Third Circuit Rules It Is Illegal to Discriminate Against an Employee For Having an Abortion
- Courts Unfriendly to Employment Plaintiffs-Harvard Study
- Finally-Religious Based Harassment is Truly Illegal in New Jersey
- Corporate Greed
- Bigoted Pediatrician
- Governor Corzine Lets Down The People of New Jersey
- Racism in the Jury Box
- The McDonalds Myth
- Caps On Damages Dont Work
- A Rose By Any Other Name - Marriage
- What Workplace Harassment Says About Our Society
- The Road So Far
March 14, 2013
Workers' Compensation Rights are Protected by Law
Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
Posted by: Kevin Costello
You’ve heard me blog on this before, despite the fact that I'm an employment lawyer, about the nonsense from the insurance industry on the medical malpractice 'crisis.' The insurance liars use doctors and nurses as unwitting pawns to spread lies about how “tort reform” is going to drive down medical malpractice costs.
You’ve heard me tell you that the statistics do not defend this position, and that 90,000 people a year suffer as a result of preventable medical errors.
You’ve heard me tell you about how only 8% of malpractice which actually occurs ever enters a court room, and how only a fraction of those cases result in a positive verdict for plaintiffs.
You’ve heard me tell you that the real reason insurance costs rise for doctors is because insurance companies raise their prices; there's no control imposed by gutless legislative bodies, because insurance industries contribute so much money to their campaigns on both sides of the aisle. You’ve also heard me tell you that one of the reasons that insurance costs have risen across the board for all professions is because, since 9/11, and as a result of the bad economy, the insurance industry as a whole – including the interconnected portions of it that are part of the medical malpractice writing group – are trying to spread their risk around and make everyone pay.
All that aside, they never stop, because why should they? As long as there's a tight economy and legislatures are responsive to “doom and gloom” predictions of lost jobs, insurance executives and their lap dogs will always seize an opportunity to erode the rights of the individual.
Yet finally, some common sense seems to be prevailing.
In Illinois, the short sighted legislatures passed a “cap” on medical malpractice damages, as if to suggest that someone whose life is devastated or lost by a medical mistake may only recover a tiny portion of their losses because the “poor, poor doctors,” driving in their Mercedes from one of their homes to the other, can’t afford the “high” cost of medical malpractice premiums. Better to assist the doctors by capping damages – which in fact doesn’t assist the doctors at all, but instead assists the insurance companies – then actually making the doctors stop making the mistakes, or by making the insurance companies lower their rates.
The Supreme Court of Illinois has said “no” to that nonsense in a recent decision. The Center for Constitutional Litigation argued that the “cap” on medical malpractice damages imposed by the legislature usurped the function of the judiciary and with it, the function of the jury. The Supreme Court of Illinois agreed, halting, for now, the march of corporate and insurance greed.
I almost feel sorry for the doctors, because I know that within their particular field of science, they are very bright people. You would have to have been to have gotten through medical school. With that brightness, however, can sometimes come arrogance, because out of their element, they are no more knowledgeable about the way the insurance companies work than “Joe the plumber” or “Dan the ditch digger”.
The doctors and nurses are being lied to by their carriers. They are being told that their rates will come down if only jury verdicts are forced down. Of course, the rates will never lower even if the caps are imposed, because the insurance industry is going to find another reason why the rates have to stay high “for now” until more changes to their liking are made in the fabric of our society.
It’s un-American and it ain’t right.
The insurance industry as a whole and, particularly, the medical malpractice insurance lobby, are lurking muggers on the “journey to justice.”
That’s all for now.
JOURNEY TO JUSTICE
DISCLAIMER: This web log is not legal advice, nor should it be construed to be legal advice or the offering of legal advice. It should not be read as guaranteeing or suggesting any particular outcome in any Court will occur in any particular case. It is not, and should be read as, a complete or authoritative analysis of the state of law, which is constantly subject to change.
"Journey to Justice" - The Web Log of Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Kevin M. Costello, Esq. (www.costellomains.com).