Finally-Religious Based Harassment is Truly Illegal in New Jersey
Subscribe to our RSS Feed:
Topics
- Consumer and Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Discusses Bill Prohibiting Attorney's Fees for 'Technical Violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act'
- Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Applauds Appointment of First Openly Gay Supreme Court Justice in New Jersey Bruce Harris
- Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Arkansas' Supreme Court Declaration of Punitive Damages 'Cap' as Unconstitutional
- New Jersey Civil and Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Penn State and Syracuse Sex Abuse Cases
- New Jersey Civil Rights Attorney Opposes Christie's Remarks About Judge Feinberg
- New Jersey Harassment Lawyer Discusses Gay Bashing Statements by Public School Teacher
- The Occupation of New York City - What it Means to You
- The End of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'
- Justice is About More Than Money
- Proud to be an American
- The Steady Slide Toward Theocracy in the United States
- The 'Nullification' Amendment and the Destruction of America
- Honorable Republican Against Tort Reform
- Don't Change the Consumer Fraud Act
- New Jersey’s Anti-Bullying Law Not Tough Enough
- California Elects its First Transgendered Judge
- What I'm Thankful For
- The Beginning of The End For 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
- No Compelled Defense Medical Exams in New Jersey Discrimination Cases
- Unfair Doesn't Mean Illegal
- Everyone vs. Everyone Why South Park’s Treatment of Sexual Harassment in Schools is no Joke
- The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is Unconstitutional
- 'Full Marriage Equality' Editorial
- Governor Christie Makes History By Politicizing the New Jersey Supreme Court
- School Bullying Results in 800000 Verdict
- Big Brother is Watching Civil Rights Abuses by Schools
- Illinois Supreme Court Overturns Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Matters
- Why Arbitration Agreements Are Un-American
- It's Time to Pierce the Corporate Veil in Discrimination Cases
- Sexual Discrimination in Contractual Relationships
- The Truth About Who Files Lawsuits
- Of Free Speech vs. Hate Speech
- Plausibility and Common Sense DANGER
- I Didn't Sexually Harass Her But They Fired Me Anyway
- Why Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Claims Is Un-American
- New Jersey Considers Workplace Bullying Law
- Racial Harassment in Bergen County-Justice for Roberth Morales
- Third Circuit Rules It Is Illegal to Discriminate Against an Employee For Having an Abortion
- Courts Unfriendly to Employment Plaintiffs-Harvard Study
- Finally-Religious Based Harassment is Truly Illegal in New Jersey
- Corporate Greed
- Bigoted Pediatrician
- Governor Corzine Lets Down The People of New Jersey
- Racism in the Jury Box
- The McDonalds Myth
- Caps On Damages Dont Work
- A Rose By Any Other Name - Marriage
- What Workplace Harassment Says About Our Society
- The Road So Far
Recent Updates
February 1, 2012
Consumer and Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Discusses Bill Prohibiting Attorney's Fees for 'Technical Violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act'
January 25, 2012
Employment and Civil Rights Attorney Applauds Appointment of First Openly Gay Supreme Court Justice in New Jersey Bruce Harris
January 11, 2012
Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Arkansas' Supreme Court Declaration of Punitive Damages 'Cap' as Unconstitutional
December 20, 2011
New Jersey Civil and Employment Rights Lawyer Discusses Penn State and Syracuse Sex Abuse Cases
October 27, 2011
New Jersey Civil Rights Attorney Opposes Christie's Remarks About Judge Feinberg
Finally-Religious Based Harassment is Truly Illegal in New Jersey
Posted by: Kevin Costello
Until the New Jersey Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Cutler v. Dorn, victims of religious based harassment in the workplace in New Jersey have labored under a significant disadvantage. As a result of a regrettable 1999 opinion from the Appellate Division in Heitzman v. Monmouth, religious harassment victims had been forced to meet a higher standard of proof as to what constituted a religiously hostile workplace than had other hostile workplace victims, such as those suffering racially or sexually hostile workplaces.
The Heitzman Court, with all due respect, seemed to pick and choose which evidence it considered to support the hostile workplace claim, seeming to torture the fact pattern so that evidence which was strongly supportive of the plaintiff's claims was not considered, while 'weak' evidence was. The result was an opinion which seemed to set the bar higher for religiously hostile workplace claims than for hostile workplace claims of any other type.
And boy, did the defense bar jump all over it. In every case of religious harassment - and in many other types of harassment cases - the defense bar attempted to use the Heitzman decision to start chipping away at the gold standard for a hostile workplace claim in New Jersey as set forth in the Lehmann v. Toys 'R' Us decision.
Heitzman had since 1999 therefore represented a road block against a number of meritorious cases, resulting in unfair and early dismissal or impaired value, for many years, until the recent decision of Cutler v. Dorn.
Finally, as a result of the Cutler v. Dorn decision, religious harassment cases are now adjudicated in exactly the same way as are other workplace harassment cases. The standard for religious harassment cases is now higher than it is for other types of harassment cases.
The employment bar is most encouraged by the elimination of the Heitzman decision and by the placement on equal footing of religious based harassment claims with other types of harassment prohibited under the New Jersey LAD.
JOURNEY TO JUSTICE
DISCLAIMER: This web log is not legal advice, nor should it be construed to be legal advice or the offering of legal advice. It should not be read as guaranteeing or suggesting any particular outcome in any Court will occur in any particular case. It is not, and should be read as, a complete or authoritative analysis of the state of law, which is constantly subject to change.
"Journey to Justice" - The Web Log of Civil Rights Trial Lawyer Kevin M. Costello, Esq. (www.costellomains.com).
